Search for: "Mark A. Grant"
Results 1 - 20
of 18,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
The post Biden marks Earth Day by announcing $7B in federal solar power grants appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
The post District Court Grants Motion for Summary Judgment for Lack of Marking Where Plaintiff Marked Packaging with Patent Numbers But Not the Product Itself appeared first on Patent Lawyer Blog. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:24 pm
The Board granted Applicant's motion for summary judgment in a Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark T.I.P.S. - TEACHER INSPIRED PRACTICAL STUFF for printed course materials for elementary school education and for learning centers for elementary school students. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:58 am
Finding the first DuPont factor to be dispositive, the Board granted the motion and dismissed the opposition. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:02 am
A company operating in Las Vegas has finally been granted a new business license after its owner suffered a black mark against his record. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:04 am
The high-water mark for USPTO patent grants is 2006 — that year, the office issued 173,772 utility patents. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:46 pm
" The post Mar-a-Lago Raid: 11th Circuit Grants Partial Stay of District Court Special Master Order As To Documents Marked Classified first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:16 am
[Even the DOUBLE A mark? [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:44 am
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of summary judgment of no liability for false marking in Pequignot v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:04 am
In two ex parte applications, Greenwood J granted interlocutory injunctions restraining Customs from releasing imported goods which allegedly infringe a trade mark. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:41 am
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's false marking claim based on defendant's incorrect statement that patented software was "functioning" on a website. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 pm
Three more false marking cases had their motions examined by Judge Michael Schneider in Tyler at their status conferences yesterday. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 10:05 pm
In a decision Wednesday, the Third Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in a trademark case, finding the asserted mark not protectible as a matter of law.The district court granted summary judgment that the mark was generic. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Today, in this case and another involving the same plaintiff Judge Schneider ruled on precisely this issue and concluded that the plaintiff had not satisfied the new standard and accordingly granted the motion to dismiss and dismissed the case, this time with prejudice... thus making this very possibly the last noncompetitor false marking case ended on the merits during the 21 month life of the cause of action. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:40 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justice Lewison, Moylan and Arnold) Marks and Spencer PLC v Aldi Stores Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 178 (27 Feb 2024) This was an appeal against the relief granted to Marks and Spencer Plc ("M&S") by His Honour Judge Hacon for infringement of the above registered designs by Aldi Stores Ltd. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
The Central District of California agreed, and granted Able Time’s motion for summary judgment finding the civil penalty that Customs imposed was unlawful. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
The Board granted summary judgment to Opposer Daimler Chrysler in its Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark FORADODGE for various consulting services. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:28 pm
Mark A. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:48 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking case for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:42 am
The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment of no false marking where defendants presented evidence that "[they have] over 1,000 [SKU's], that each SKU generally has its product’s applicable patent number marked on the back of the product packaging, that many of the product packages were created with older packages as templates, and that [defendants'] counsel . . . has been in poor health and not readily available for consultation. .… [read post]
